Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

There are no studies homeopathy Works

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • There are no studies homeopathy Works

    there are no studies that prove homeopathy works

    In the past 24 years there have been more than 180 controlled, and 118 randomized, trials into homeopathy, which were analysed by four separate meta-analyses. In each case, the researchers concluded that the benefits of homeopathy went far beyond that which could be explained purely by the placebo effect. Another meta-analysis found that 65 of the 89 trials analysed had produced an effect way beyond placebo (source WDDTY www.wddty.co.uk )

    A study of 6500 patients at the Bristol Homeopathic hospital was conducted showing that over 70% of patients reported complete cure or significant improvement of their symptoms. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/4454856.stm

    A study on the properties of water was performed by Dr. Rustrum Roy. This paper provides an interdisciplinary base of information on the structure of liquid water.
    The Structure Of Liquid Water; Novel Insights From Materials Research; Potential Relevance To Homeopathy
    Rustum Roy1, W.A. Tiller2, Iris Bell3, M. R. Hoover4
    Received: 2 August 2004 Revised: 6 September 2004 Accepted: 14
    http://www.rustumroy.com/Roy_Structure%20of%20Water.pdf
    http://www.infiniteconferencing.com/Events/nch/051607nch/recording-playback.html
    Homeopathy can never be tested properly through conventional trials because each prescription is individualised as every person is unique. Therefore 10 people with arthritis, for example, may all need a different homeopathic medicine. So it is far from ideal to follow the allopathic trial paradigm to test homeopathy. In orthodox medicine trials, all are given the same medicine to be tested. In homeopathy all may be given different medicines!

    Anybody who has an understanding of the principles of homeopathy can be left in no doubt that we are dealing with a scientific therapeutic method in the best possible sense: it is based on observation, facts and phenomena and follows the rules of inductive logic that can be tested in daily practice. It is a comprehensive and comprehensible mode of therapy, which in some countries is first line treatment for the whole range of acute and chronic conditions. It has been proven abundantly that it is superior in the treatment of epidemic diseases to allopathy.

    It is amazing how people, who like to see themselves on the side of unprejudiced evaluation, can be so blinkered. People pass judgment on homeopathy who have never bothered to study it. Like any science it takes time to learn (especially to learn it correctly) and years of practice to master but the rewards for patients, practitioners and the NHS purse are great. Before those who preach pure science come down on therapies like homeopathy too heavily, they should ask themselves how many of the accepted treatments within the NHS have a scientific evidence base?

    Those, who claim to be scientists, should have the ability to at least try to understand different paradigms. If not, they look more like people who have settled on a comfortable view of the world which might soon look very outmoded indeed. As the great musician and conductor Sir Yehudi Menhuin once said: 'Homeopathy is one of the few specialised areas in medicine, which carries no disadvantages but only advantages.'.

    Regarding the Horizon programme on homeopathy, Prof. Madeleine Ennis was not involved in the Horizon test. The test was carried out by Wayne Turnbull at Guys hospital, London. It has been conceded that the Horizon test was not an exact replica of Ennis' successful trials. Many of his protocols were different. You can read at this link where he added in an ammonium chloride lysis step which would have ended up killing the very basophils that were such an integral part of the test. http://www.homeopathic.com/articles/view,55
    Ennis' original test was replicated in 4 different labs in 4 different countries.

    Dr. Peter Fisher's article in PubMed discusses the 'End of Homeopathy' editorial and meta-analysis published in the Lancet of 26th August 2005 and how nearly 100 successful studies that showed homeopathy worked were thrown out and only a few that were inconclusive were used. Dr. Fisher is the Queen's homeopathic physician and heads the Royal London Homeopathic Hospital. (The vitriolic editorial was caused by the World Health Organisation bringing out a draft report in 2005 which was favourable towards homeopathy!)

    "The final analysis which concluded that ‘the clinical effects of homoeopathy are placebo effects’ was based on just eight clinical trials of homeopathy. The Lancet's press release did not mention this, instead giving the impression that the conclusions were based on all 110 trials." "One of the most serious criticisms is the complete lack of transparency: we have no idea which eight trials were included in the final, damning, analysis." "The literature references are not given, nor any information on the diagnoses, numbers of patients, etc., nor can these be deduced from the article. Prof. Egger has refused several requests to disclose the identity of the eight trials. This is not even a matter of scientific method, but of natural justice: the accused has the right to know the evidence against him."
    “The Lancet meta-analysis in 2005 of homeopathic trials was said to be based upon 110 placebo-controlled clinical trials of homeopathy and 110 clinical trials of allopathy, which were said to be matched but were in fact reduced to 21 trials of homeopathy and 9 of conventional medicine and further reduced to 8 and 6 trials.”
    http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1375230
    Other Responses from the Homeopathic Community on the Lancet Article
    http://www.ontariohomeopath.com/Response2.htm
    from WDDTY
    http://www.zeusinfoservice.com/Articles/ShockingTruth.html

    George Vithoulkas' 'Science of Homeopathy' is still considered an excellent exposition of the science.
    http://www.wholehealthnow.com/books/science-of-homeopathy.html
    More scientific studies:
    http://www.vhan.nl/documents/ScientificReportECHNov04.pdf
    http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/4/1/7
    http://www.positivehealth.com/research-list.php?subjectid=134
    Bizarre chemical discovery gives homeopathic hint

    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1532-bizarre-chemical-discovery-gives-homeopathic-hint.html

    Groundbreaking Research regarding Homeopathy using spectroscopy
    Scientific Evidence? The Raw Data - NASA’s TRLs and Modern Medicine’s Immature and High-Risk Evidence http://www.jeggels.com/Scientific%20Evidence.htm



    "Great ideas often recieve violent opposition from mediocre minds"...................Einstein
Working...
X